To be Notified
click the following button:
Most of us tend to believe that article submission software do their jobs wonderfully well, automatically. I wish it were true! Once we’ve submitted our articles using submission software, we move on, only monitoring to see if the number of back links increase steadily. In fact, we may not even know which of our articles brought us the back links. Any more levels of details, like which of our articles actually got published in which article directories, and which of these got recognized by the various search engines as back links,… these are info hard to get. Nor do we have time to monitor at this micro level.
But unless we have some level of control over the process, chances are we may be missing something for far too long. For example, some directories may never accept our articles, for some reason. Some directories may always fail due to internal errors (like database errors, slow loading, and changes effected in their urls/ forms/ variable names), till the errors are rectified. Some directories may have been deleted, or may not longer be article directories, and may have been redirected. True, as users, we won’t have much time to bother about these levels of details, but the submission software should.
One of the simpler things a good article submission software should do is to monitor each article submission, and create a report for us to see which of our articles were submitted, when, and which ones failed while submitting to which directories. And whenever a submission fails, the submission software should attempt to re-submit to the failed directories for the next few days, at least once a day, for a reasonable length of time, say one month. And make sure that an article version meant for a failed submission is not used for another directory while re-submission.
This strategy would help make sure that you get the full value of your every article. And get you more back links, more SE rankings, more traffic, sales and profits.
Comments